There is often confusion between Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) and SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) solutions, as both are designed to address security issues within SaaS applications. CASBs protect sensitive data by implementing multiple security policy enforcements to safeguard critical data. For identifying and classifying sensitive information, like Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Intellectual Property (IP), and business records, CASBs definitely help.

However, as the number of SaaS apps increase, the amount of misconfigurations and possible exposure widens and cannot be mitigated by CASBs. These solutions act as a link between users and cloud service providers and can identify issues across various cloud environments. Where CASBs fall short is that they identify breaches after they happen.

When it comes to getting full visibility and control over the organization’s SaaS apps, an SSPM solution would be the better choice, as the security team can easily onboard apps and get value in minutes — from the immediate configuration assessment to its ongoing and continuous monitoring. By fixing these configuration weaknesses and misconfigurations in the SaaS stack, the security team is actually preventing a leak or breach.

To fully understand why SSPM is the ideal solution for today’s SaaS environment, it’s best to take a look at the challenges that accompany these deployments.

In a 2021 survey, eighty-five percent of InfoSecurity professionals cited SaaS misconfigurations as one of the top three risks facing today’s organizations. The challenge stems from what we like to call the three V’s of SaaS Security:

SaaS app providers build in robust security features that are designed to protect company and user data, yet whether the features are implemented correctly is another matter.

The configurations and enforcement fall under the responsibility of the organization utilizing the app.

A SaaS Security Posture Management solution, like Adaptive Shield, is critical to the security of today’s enterprise. Gartner predicts SSPM will increase its impact over the next five to ten years. With its ability to effectively manage this chaotic SaaS environment, SSPM can continuously assess and manage the security risk and posture of SaaS apps and prevent configuration errors and advanced attacks. While CASBs do address an organization’s security gaps at the SaaS layer, they are, as mentioned earlier, primarily reactive, focusing on the detection of breaches once they have occurred.

When it comes to preventing misconfigurations, proactive identification is key, making SSPM the best option to ensure a secure and safe SaaS environment.

A former cybersecurity intelligence officer in the IDF, Maor has over 16 years in cybersecurity leadership. In his career, he led SaaS Threat Detection Research at Proofpoint and won the operational excellence award during his IDI service. Maor got his BSc in Computer Science and is CEO and co-founder of Adaptive Shield. 

The post The Differences in How CASB vs. SSPM Secures SaaS Apps appeared first on IT Security Guru.


You May Also Like

Deepfence Cloud builds on ThreatStryker security observability platform

Deepfence, a security observability and protection company, has launched Deepfence Cloud, a…